2011年3月9日 星期三

T-Mobile Deal Is Marathon Not a Sprint




Sprint Nextel and Deutsche Telekom would do well to remember that mergers, like marriage, require compromise.
[Sprintherd]
Shareholders of both companies should be encouraged by news that the two are talking about combining Sprint with Deutsche Telekom's T-Mobile USA. If logic prevails, a deal will be struck, eventually. But negotiations for any potential deal would have to overcome obstacles.
With 33.7 million and about 50 million subscribers respectively, T-Mobile and Sprint are too small to compete effectively against U.S. leaders Verizon Wireless and AT&T, which have 94.1 million and 95.5 million, respectively.
Bloomberg News
The biggest challenge is likely valuation. While Sprint has more customers, Sanford C. Bernstein noted in late January that T-Mobile is more profitable.
But time isn't of the essence. For instance, while T-Mobile has said it needs more wireless spectrum to give it more capacity for high-speed wireless service, it may feel it is in a reasonably competitive position with what it is now marketing as 4G. But that likely won't be sufficient for more than a few years. Sprint could resolve T-Mobile's spectrum issue through its majority stake in Clearwire, which operates a high-speed wireless network Sprint is using for 4G.
Meanwhile, the technology differences that long complicated a deal are diminishing. Sprint still operates two older networks using different technologies, both distinct from T-Mobile's 3G technology, but one is being phased out.
The biggest challenge is likely valuation. While Sprint has more customers, Sanford C. Bernstein noted in late January that T-Mobile is more profitable. Sprint also is weighed down by nearly $15 billion of net debt. Bernstein calculated, using estimates of 2010 earnings, that T-Mobile's owner should have a 57% equity stake in the combined company.
Each side likely will have to give ground. But there's no question that in a world of giants, Sprint and T-Mobile would be better off together.
Write to Martin Peers at martin.peers@wsj.com

沒有留言:

張貼留言