2011年6月7日 星期二

Amid Euphoria, Beware Getting Caught by Groupthink on Groupon

JUNE 4, 2011   the wall street journal


Turning down $6 billion never looked so smart.
That was the price at which Google offered to buy Groupon in December. Now, with the daily-deal website set to generate perhaps $3.5 billion of revenue in 2011, up more than 100-fold from 2009, it will surely secure far more when it stages its initial public offering.
Bloomberg News
But investors should think hard before jumping on the bandwagon. First off, given the euphoria surrounding the IPOs of lower-profile, slower-expanding companies LinkedIn and Yandex, by the time investors can buy into Groupon the price is unlikely to be in tune with the daily bargains it offers.
More important, the picture that emerges from the company's financial statements is cloudier than the stupendous top-line performance suggests.
Groupon clearly has succeeded in building a huge user base fast and will no doubt gain an extra boost from hype around the IPO. And that gives it some room to differentiate itself. For example, a new product that enables subscribers to find nearby deals from a mobile device is only possible because of Groupon's huge number of merchant relationships.
In an interview with WSJ's Kevin Delaney, Groupon and LinkedIn investor Marc Andreessen insists that the recent popularity of tech companies does not constitute a bubble. He also stressed that both Apple and Google are undervalued and that "the market doesn't like tech."
But the biggest issue is the sheer cost of staying ahead of the pack. Last quarter, Groupon's gross profit, a more relevant measure than revenue because it strips out the cut that goes to merchants, was $270 million. But it spent four-fifths of that on marketing in order to acquire email subscribers faster than rivals. Include other operating expenses, and the company is losing money.
To create a patina of profitability, Groupon invents a bizarre profit-before-costs measure that excludes online-marketing expenses. These added up to a whopping $180 million in the first quarter. Excluding these and other costs flips the company's first-quarter net loss of $117 million to an "adjusted" profit of $82 million. But why should online ads be excluded while Groupon's Super Bowl ads aren't?
Investors shouldn't assume these costs will magically disappear. There is nothing to stop subscribers switching to rival deal sites. So, Groupon will likely need to keep spending heavily on marketing to boost its customer base and fend off heavyweights like Facebook and Google as they jump into the business.
Will investors snap up Groupon shares? Likely, yes. But are there also reasons to be concerned about the daily deals darling? Yes indeed. Shira Ovide reports.
But Groupon believes its headlong growth will translate into strong profits. It cites data that show North American subscribers acquired for $18 million in the second quarter of 2010 have since generated $62 million of gross profit. But, again, other operating costs aren't included in the calculation, clouding the picture.
Meanwhile, competition for subscribers is heating up. Overall, Groupon's marketing cost per new subscriber was $6.40 in the first quarter, up from $2.50 in 2009.
In addition to making it costlier to acquire new subscribers, rivals could attack Groupon's business in other ways. For instance, many offer a better cut of revenue for merchants. Outside the U.S., they may have extra room to undercut Groupon. In overseas markets, Groupon keeps all the revenue from unredeemed coupons, including the merchant's cut. Rivals that share the bounty may be more compelling for merchants to work with.
Groupon has every incentive to move fast on its IPO, in order to cash in while its expansion is in overdrive. But investors should take their time in assessing whether the company's explosive growth really will translate to surging future profits.
Write to Rolfe Winkler at rolfe.winkler@wsj.com

Slow Growth Doesn't Mean a Fast Fed

JUNE 4, 2011   THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


Cue the Fed. That is one reaction to signs of economic weakness that culminated with Friday's disappointing U.S. jobs figure.
It is easy to see why. Investors, especially in stocks, have become conditioned to thinking the Federal Reserve will ride to their rescue when times get tough. But barring a precipitous drop in markets, investors shouldn't count on the Fed acting too quickly. Nor should the Fed be itching to again expand its balance sheet, after it completes its second round of bond buying in June.
[bernanke0516]Getty Images
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, pictured in May at the 'New Building Blocks for Jobs and Economic Growth' conference at Georgetown University
For starters, May's paltry 54,000 jobs gain doesn't signal a collapse in employment growth. The monthly figure is volatile, subject to revisions and may have been affected by effects from Japan's destructive earthquake. Since the start of the year, monthly employment gains have averaged about 155,000.
Granted, that level is nowhere near enough to offset the millions of jobs lost during the recession. And such gains are anemic from a historical perspective. John Lonski, chief economist at Moody's Capital Markets, noted that following the 1981-82 recession, work-force-adjusted payrolls rose by as much as 579,000 new jobs a month, on average.
Getty Images
But today's recovery was never likely to follow historical precedents. The overindebted U.S. faces a balance-sheet recession. Even though fiscal and monetary stimulus stopped a deflationary spiral, households and the government still need to reduce debt. Household debt as a percentage of personal income is down from bubble-era levels of about 130%, but it still needs to fall markedly.
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke already has indicated that the bar for further extraordinary measures is higher than before. After all, though bond buying pushes up the price of riskier assets like stocks, it also carries the risk of stoking bubbles and broader inflation as well as driving up commodity prices, which sap the spending power of the poor.
It also is worth remembering the last time the Fed decided on extraordinary action. In spring 2010, stocks peaked, the U.S. economic recovery faltered and financial markets became jittery over Europe's debt crisis. Yet the Fed waited and watched until mid-August, when Mr. Bernanke in a speech hinted at plans for another bout of government bond buying. During that time, stock markets fell about 15% from their April high to July nadir.
Granted, Europe is in crisis again. Global growth also is starting to slow, especially as China tries to rein in inflation. Yet markets are hardly in free fall. The S&P 500 is off about 4% from its recent high, and is still up nearly 20% from a year ago. Riskier assets such as high-yield corporate bonds have seen yields fall to below 7%, a historically low level.
And the politics of extraordinary Fed action have become more complicated. The Fed's most recent bond-buying program was met with opposition domestically and internationally. Countries have accused the Fed of exporting inflation. China's moves to tighten policy are one response and are raising the prospect of slowing global growth.
The likely result is a wait-and-see approach, as the Fed watches the incoming data as well as how the government responds to the debt-ceiling and deficit issues. If nothing else, Mr. Bernanke has to take off the markets' training wheels and force investors to try pedaling on their own.
Write to David Reilly at david.reilly@wsj.com

OPEC Quotas Not the Key to Oil Prices

JUNE 6, 2011   THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


OPEC meetings, with their convoys of limos and whispered asides in hotel lobbies, often are a triumph of ceremony over substance. Speculation is rife the cartel will raise output quotas at its gathering this week. But investors should stay focused on broader economic trends shaping oil prices, rather than OPEC's largely symbolic decision.
The 11 nations in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries subject to a quota are producing far more oil already than their self-imposed limit of 24.8 million barrels of oil a day. In April, the excess production was running at 1.4 million barrels a day, according to the International Energy Agency. And despite the loss of about 1.4 million barrels a day of Libyan supply, Saudi Arabia, OPEC's de facto leader, has reduced production since February.
The reluctance to raise output reflects signs of weakening demand. Grim global manufacturing data in May are the latest bearish sign. Even China's Purchasing Managers' Index reading was at a 20-month low. In the U.S., jobs growth stalled in May and crude-oil stocks rose unexpectedly last week as high gasoline prices crimp demand. The IEA has trimmed back its estimate of annual oil-demand growth for 2011.
The cartel is in a tricky position. Standing pat, as countries like Iran are urging, would signal OPEC is happy with triple-digit oil prices and, by extension, running the risk of demand destruction for oil and encouraging alternatives. That's something Saudi's Prince Alwaleed bin Talal warned about last month. Further easing in U.S. monetary policy or an end to Chinese tightening to combat slowing economic growth could compound any oil price increase.
A big quota increase, however, could coincide with a real slowdown to push oil prices much lower, a repeat of 1998's mistake that forced OPEC to get its act together. Now, after two quarters in which global oil demand exceeded supply, the equation returned to balance at the end of the first quarter of 2011.
The likeliest outcome is an increase in quotas to legitimize all or part of the 1.4 million barrels a day of quota busting already going on. That would send a clear signal that triple-digit oil is undesirable from OPEC's perspective, while avoiding the addition of many more real barrels at a time when macroeconomic forces are in the driving seat and tapping the brakes.
Should the weakness prove temporary, perhaps helped by moderate oil prices, those quotas can always be busted again.
Write to Andrew Peaple at andrew.peaple@dowjones.com and Liam Denning atliam.denning@wsj.com

2011年6月6日 星期一

Get Ready: Here Comes the Yuan

JUNE 2, 2011   THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


The wall is starting to crack.
For years, China has made it tough for capital to flow to and from its economy, the second-largest in the world. Now, the government in Beijing is forging ahead with a campaign to bring the yuan onto the world stage—and breaches are appearing in that formidable financial barrier.

Journal Report

Read the complete The Rise of the Yuan report.

Related

A yuan that's more widely used in international trade and investment could eventually challenge the dollar's supremacy, correct some of the imbalances that plague the Chinese and global economy, and force a profligate U.S. to live within its means.
Brian Stauffer
It won't be an easy transition. There are powerful vested interests in China that are satisfied with the status quo and will try to put the brakes on any reform effort. But the changes China has made so far have generated momentum both at home and internationally—and may prove too strong to resist.
Dow Jones Newswires reporter Jamila Trindle joins the News Hub to discuss Chinese authorities opening up the Yuan for international trade. Photo: REUTERS/Stringer
For more than a decade, China's closed capital account has been a defining feature of the global economy. It has insulated the mainland from international capital flows, enabling China to ride out the Asian financial crisis in 1997 and leaving its banks unscathed by the near-collapse of the U.S. financial system in 2008.
As important, denying foreign-exchange markets a role in setting the exchange rate has allowed the government to maintain the value of the yuan at an artificially low level—supporting a 30-year export boom. Since Chinese savers can't take their money overseas, banks have also gotten away with offering them low interest rates, keeping the cost of capital for industry at bargain-basement prices and underpinning an investment binge.
Take the example of Shenzhen—a fishing village in 1979, in 2011 a metropolis of 14 million built around the world's fourth-busiest port. Low-cost capital subsidized the construction of transport and power infrastructure, factories and production lines. An undervalued yuan, combined with low cost of labor, enabled companies to undercut their foreign rivals on price.
But manipulation of the exchange rate and repression of the interest rate comes at a cost. Cheap capital has resulted in overcapacity in the industrial sector and bubbles in the mainland's property market. Managing the exchange rate in the face of trade surpluses has resulted in the buildup of gargantuan foreign-exchange reserves—$3.04 trillion that China has little choice but to recycle as cut-price loans to the U.S.
One of the first cracks in China's restrictive policy came in July 2009, with a plan to allow settlement of import and export transactions in yuan. Wider international use of the yuan is intended to reduce transaction costs for China's importers and exporters, guard against the risk of a collapse in dollar trade financing—as occurred at the end of 2008—and fly the flag for a rising economic world power.
By the first quarter of 2011, $55 billion of China's trade—7% of the total—was settled in yuan. At the end of April 2011, yuan deposits in the Hong Kong banking system had risen to 511 billion, or $79 billion, up roughly ninefold from July 2009 when the settlement program was launched.
Restrictions on outbound flows are also being lifted. In the past month, the Shanghai government announced plans to allow residents of the city to make investments overseas.
But more substantial opening of the capital account will require progress in two areas: an exchange rate that is close to fair value and market-set interest rates. The yuan is still undervalued, but two factors suggest it's much closer to market value than it used to be: It has appreciated 20% in real terms against a trade-weighted basket of currencies since 2005, and China's current-account surplus fell to 5.2% of gross domestic product in 2010 from 10.1% in 2007.
If the yuan is approaching fair value, the Chinese government will be able to loosen controls on the capital account with less chance of triggering destabilizing speculative inflows.
China's interest rates, meanwhile, are still set by the government. But the People's Bank of China is attempting to make progress, by taking a leaf out of the mainland's economic history.
At the beginning of the reform era, China's government designated Shenzhen as a special economic zone where market-based policies could be tried before being expanded to the rest of the country. Hong Kong will serve as a similar site of experimentation for reform of the mainland's financial system. Yields on yuan-denominated debt trading in Hong Kong are already set by the market rather than with reference to the People's Bank of China's benchmark interest rate.
According to the Royal Bank of Scotland, the value of bonds outstanding in this so-called dim-sum market has risen to the equivalent of $15.8 billion from about $5.3 billion at the end of 2009. McDonald's Corp. and Caterpillar Inc. are among the companies that have turned to the new market for financing.
The increase in trade settlement and the development of Hong Kong as a yuan financial center are mutually reinforcing. More yuan trade settlement adds to the pool of liquidity in Hong Kong, encouraging the development of more yuan investment products, and greater variety of investment products reinforces the incentive to use the yuan in trade settlement.
What Comes Next
Now pressure is building on China to open further channels into its capital markets. The question is whether change comes fast or slow. China's leaders seemed to be taking the cautious route. The target of making Shanghai an international financial center by 2020 was regarded as the de facto target date for capital-account opening. But the rapid progress of the past year has raised expectations of opening earlier.
If China accelerates its timetable, the implications are enormous. A higher interest rate will mean slower expansion of investment, eating into the mainland's appetite for commodities and shifting the main domestic growth engine down a gear.
A more expensive yuan will limit demand for exports that have catalyzed the explosive growth of China's east coast. Low-value-added makers of textiles, toys and tools—where margins are razor thin—will be the first to shut up shop. High-technology manufacturers like Foxconn—the trade name of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., which makes the iPad—have already decided to move production facilities inland, to find cheaper labor away from the coast.
The same dynamic that will make investment less affordable and exporting less profitable means more spending power for China's households—kick-starting efforts to bring domestic demand to the fore as a driver of growth. In the U.S., businesses from Napa Valley wine makers to manufacturers of cinema projectors in Nebraska are hoping to cash in on the rise of the Chinese consumer.
Not all of the changes will be so positive for the U.S. Reduced intervention by China in foreign-exchange markets will lead to a reduction in demand for U.S. Treasury debt, not just from China but also from other Asian nations that have followed China's lead in managing their exchange rates. That will increase the cost of borrowing for the U.S., making it more difficult to finance public debt and continued current-account deficits.
Displacing the Dollar?
The next step in the development of the yuan as an international currency—a role as a reserve currency held by central banks—will require more substantial progress. A capital account that still remains tightly controlled means the Chinese currency can't fulfill the main function of reserves: a liquid asset that central banks can use to stabilize the value of their domestic currency.
The transition to an open capital account won't be easy. Powerful groups in the export sector, state-owned enterprises, banks and local government benefit from a low interest rate and undervalued yuan. The door to reform is not wide open, but neither is it locked.
Reform has its own logic and its own momentum. Companies that raise yuan financing offshore today will demand increased opportunities to bring those yuan onto the mainland tomorrow. If interest rates are higher offshore, investors on the mainland will find opportunities to move their yuan in the other direction. If legitimate channels don't exist, companies with an onshore and offshore presence will find ways of circumventing China's capital controls.
We aren't there yet. Yuan deposits in Hong Kong aren't yet equal to 1% of those on the mainland. But the pool of offshore yuan, available at interest rates set by the market, is growing fast—reducing the effectiveness of China's capital controls and the ability of the central bank to use administrative tools to control the mainland economy.
When the tide of offshore yuan starts to wash over the wall Beijing has built around its domestic financial system, the impact on the Chinese and the world economy will be far-reaching. China's closed capital account has been the defining feature of the world economy in the past decade; its opening could be the defining feature of the decade ahead.
Mr. Orlik is a writer for The Wall Street Journal's Heard on the Street column, based in Beijing. He can be reached at thomas.orlik@wsj.com.

Who Gains, Who Loses

JUNE 2, 2011   the wall street journal


For years, the U.S. has been the most vocal advocate of yuan appreciation, as part of its efforts to address its persistent trade deficit with China. But in the end a stronger yuan may do the U.S. little good. The biggest beneficiaries may turn out to be other emerging economies vying to compete with China as low-cost production centers.

Journal Report

Read the complete The Rise of the Yuan report.
The yuan's recent gains against the dollar, along with rising wages and general inflation in China, are starting to push some basic export industries out of that country, economists say. Those businesses are moving to countries where expenses are even lower and foreign-exchange rates don't threaten to crimp exports.
So, yes, the yuan's appreciation may help shrink the Chinese trade surplus with the U.S. by making goods from China more expensive in dollars and therefore less attractive to U.S. customers. But its overall impact on U.S. trade may not be that great, as imports from other emerging markets replace those no longer coming from China.
"The simple idea that the [yuan] is going to make a swing to the U.S. trade balance just doesn't add up," says David Carbon, head of economics and currency research at Singapore-based DBS Bank Ltd.
Moving Out
The bigger story, Mr. Carbon says, is the migration of low-end export manufacturing, a process that has been going on since World War II "and will continue on for a long time." It started with Japan, then moved to Singapore and Hong Kong, South Korea and Taiwan, and eventually China. "The guys who are left below China and could be coming up are India and Vietnam," Mr. Carbon says.
Vietnam stands out as one of the clearest beneficiaries of yuan appreciation because of the weakness of its currency, the dong. Over the past year, the yuan has risen about 14% against the dong. "There are sunset industries in China now, and for those industries the sun is rising in countries like Vietnam," says Tim Condon, chief Asia economist for ING Groep NV. Light industries such as textile manufacturing are among those most likely to make such a move, he says.
There is some benefit to the U.S. in this trend. If production moves to cheaper markets, then higher prices for goods from China because of a stronger yuan aren't likely to be a major contributor to inflation in the U.S.
Japan Wins, Too
Japan also could benefit from continued yuan appreciation, in a different way from Vietnam. It thrives by producing high-technology, high-value-added exports like hybrid vehicles and specialist manufacturing equipment, fields where China isn't yet a direct rival. So the biggest benefit to Japan of a stronger yuan isn't a greater ability to compete with China in selling to the rest of the world. Rather, it is the growing opportunity to export to China.
The yuan hasn't been gaining on the Japanese yen, though. Indeed, while the Chinese currency has risen about 5% against the dollar since last June, it has fallen about 5% against the yen.
But Mr. Carbon says that could change. Intervention in the currency markets by the Group of Seven leading nations in the wake of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami in March shows a determination not to let the yen appreciate much beyond 80 per dollar, not far from its current level, to protect Japanese exporters as the country tries to recover, he says. Thus, if the yuan continues to gain on the dollar, it eventually will start to gradually rise against the yen as well, Mr. Carbon says.
That would make Japanese goods cheaper in China, perhaps allowing Japan to build on the $49.6 billion trade surplus it had with China last year, according to Chinese data. An increase in Japanese exports to China would help offset the damage that the yen's strength against the dollar has done to Japan's trade with the U.S.—and the impact of that damage on the Japanese economy. Mr. Condon blames currency factors for the weakness of Japan's recovery from the global financial-market crash and recession of 2008-09.
Mr. Back is the deputy bureau chief for Dow Jones Newswires in China. He can be reached ataaron.back@dowjones.com.

2011年6月5日 星期日

Tencent a Better Bet Than Rivals

JUNE 1, 2011   THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


Selling Tiffany earrings and Louis Vuitton handbags to the wealthy is one way to play the emerging Chinese consumer trend. Internet company Tencent Holdings has shown that targeting online teenagers works just as well.
The secret of Tencent's success is the dominance of its QQ instant-messaging system. That isn't a money spinner itself, but it is a core part of the Internet experience for Chinese users. Tencent, which had 72% of active instant-messaging accounts in the first quarter, according to Internet research firm Analysys, has been able to take advantage of its position to win market share in more lucrative social-network and online-gaming activities.
iResearch says that is reflected in the rapid growth of Tencent's social network, Pengyou. From its launch in 2009 under a different brand, it has expanded to 100 million users today, in line with rival Renren and overtaking Kaixin101. Tencent's online games might not be any better than those developed by NetEase.com and Shanda Interactive Entertainment, but its user base means it can guarantee an army of fans. They either pay to play or to buy virtual items within the games themselves.
Tencent's users might be numerous, but they also are younger and less affluent than those of many of its rivals. At first sight, that looks like a source of weakness. In fact, it may be a source of strength. Yvonne Yang, China Internet analyst at BNP Paribas, says Tencent's teenage fan club has a higher willingness to spend online than the older, white-collar clientele of Kaixin or the urban elite users of Sina Weibo, a Twitter-like site.
For exposure to the China Internet sector, Tencent's user base and diversified offering makes it a better bet than its rivals in the social-networking and gaming spaces. A price/earnings ratio of 38 times is demanding, particularly as Tencent already has a market capitalization of $51 billion. But at least it has a strong track record of profitability, unlike Renren.
The risk is that specialty sites will gain more traction as the Chinese Internet sector matures. After all, Yahoo still has a powerful position in free email in the U.S. and once used it as a hook to build other businesses. But such traffic wasn't enough when Google and Facebook came of age.
Write to Tom Orlik at tom.orlik@wsj.com

2011年6月4日 星期六

China's Food-Inflation Villains

MAY 31, 2011    THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


Supply shocks are once again charged with pushing up China's food prices, but it is a surplus of money, not a deficit of pigs, that is the real culprit.
As of Monday, the Ministry of Agriculture's index of wholesale food prices was up 2.2% from its April level, a turnaround after two months of falling prices. Pork prices, in particular, are on the rise. With food accounting for almost a third of China's consumer price index, an increase in prices suggests the markets should prepare for another increase in inflation when the data for May are released on June 14.
The usual suspects, bad weather and outbreaks of disease, are once again accused of causing the increase in prices. This time, a drought in the Yangtze River is in the dock, with a disease in the pig population charged with aiding and abetting.
It is easy enough to blame the weather for China's climbing food prices. But the reality is that China's own monetary policy makers are behind the steady rise in the CPI.
An increase in the money supply in 2009, with growth close to 30% at the end of the year, may have been a necessary part of the economic stimulus. But keeping relaxed monetary conditions in place so far into 2010 was overkill, and there is now a price to be paid in inflation.
There is a reason why it is showing up first in food prices. The agricultural sector is supply constrained. If an increase in the money supply results in an increase in demand for clothes or televisions, China's manufacturing sector has the capacity to meet it. If there is more demand for food, supply is less responsive and prices rise.
Higher wages also are playing a part. Agriculture in China is labor intensive. As China's demographic shift reduces the supply of workers, rising wages will continue to add to the cost of food production. Rising wealth also means demand for a higher-quality diet, with more meat. Chinese demand is contributing to higher global prices for corn and soybeans, key inputs for the production of pork.
In a country as large as China, there is always a drought, disease or flood somewhere that can be blamed for rising prices. But the real villains of China's inflation are structural and won't go away with a change in the weather.
Write to Tom Orlik at tom.orlik@wsj.com